Archives for the month of: February, 2010

“I think art is the ability to change people with your work, to see things as they are and then create stories, images, and interactions that change the marketplace.”

Seth Godin (Linchpin, page 91)

I really can’t recommend Seth Godin’s latest work highly enough. I’m only halfway through, but already he’s given me a ton to think about. I’ve repeatedly thought to myself, “YES! He’s putting words to the thoughts and feelings I’ve had about work for so long.” It’s like I’ve had fleeting glimpses of this new idea of work through the fog before now, but with Seth’s help I’m seeing the idea clearly for the first time.

When I speak to people about what I do and tell them I can help them with design I often get a little resistance. My guess is they hear the word “design” and think I’m gonna make their slides look frou-frou. In reality, though nothing could be farther from the truth. Unless that’s what they want.

When you hear the word design, what comes to your mind? Making things pretty? Matching colors? Sconces? Toile curtains?

People often confuse design with decoration or unnecessary ornamentation.

Despite popular understanding, design is actually very different from decoration. Design does not necessarily imply beauty. Design involves giving careful consideration to every aspect of something to make sure it does what it’s intended to do. It implies that there is an intention or plan behind the thing you’re designing and that same plan influences every decision you make about how that object should look and function. We commonly think of design when it comes to things like furnishing our homes, but in reality every manmade object you encounter, from plungers to iPods, have been designed by someone.

I’ve always been a thinker and perhaps that’s why design appeals to me so much. I like my iPod because careful consideration has been given to every aspect of it’s creation. It’s designers valued things like beauty and simplicity and these values went into every decision that was made about it. How will it look? How will it feel? How do you get songs onto it? How do you play a song? Switch songs? Adjust the volume? The designers thought about all of that ahead of time.

Graphic design is a specific type of design in which this kind of attention to every detail is applied to the creation of visuals such as magazine ads and web pages. Decisions on things like color, size, alignment, proximity, balance, contrast, and texture are made to ensure that every part of a poster, or book cover, or business card achieves its desired effect. Visuals can be designed to inspire, to excite, to calm, to sell or to disgust. A good designer knows what feelings or ideas are conveyed by different fonts or textures or colors and will make choices accordingly.

While graphic design is certainly a part of presentation design, it is far from being all there is to it. Presentation design gives careful consideration to every part of a presentation. This includes slides, of course, but it also involves careful planning of the message that is being delivered. It involves an understanding of the audience that will be hearing the message. It involves deciding how best to display supporting evidence (charts? pictures? tables?), and in what order. It involves working with the speaker to make sure the visuals match his or her personal style. Ultimately it involves deciding what you want your audience’s experience to be and figuring out how best to make it happen. That may mean doing something very traditionally beautiful for some clients, but it may involve something relatively unattractive for the next. Whatever best communicates the message the client will be trying to convey is what will get done.

Presentation design basically means thinking about everything that goes into your presentations.

It’s easy to tell when a presentation has not been designed well. It usually obvious that the speaker did not think about her audience as much as she should have. When I point out things that could be done better to clients, they often say, “I didn’t even think about that.” That’s the main reason I would encourage you to hire a designer, or better yet read books (or blogs) that will teach you to start thinking like a designer yourself.

Just beginning to think about many of the decisions you’re making will help you greatly improve the quality of your presentations.

In Defense of FoodIt’s tremendous.

The catch is that to get the most out of that last chapter, you need to read the first 182 pages, too.

Michael Pollan is on a mission and his message is seven words long.

Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.

The amazing thing is just how well these seven words really convey the core of his message in a way that is simple and VERY easy to remember. I think I had to read it exactly twice before I had it committed to memory.

The other astonishing thing is how well Pollan makes his case for a departure from the Western diet that has become the norm in America and many other parts of the world over the last 50 years. In Defense of Food examines the industrialization of how and where we humans get our food. The question of what’s for dinner is one that has become remarkably confusing. Should we eat less fat? No fat? No carbs? More Omega-3s? More whole grains? It was shocking to me how quickly and succinctly Pollan cuts through all the myths to tell us something that probably shouldn’t surprise us: that deciding what we should eat is actually very simple.

It may seem silly to have to instruct people to do something as simple as “eat food,” but on closer inspection it’s surprising how many of the things we eat are merely food-like substances masquerading as food. Furthermore, Pollan’s recommendation of “not too much” also seems like common sense, but he goes on to demonstrate that most Americans decide to stop eating “when they run out of food” or “when they’re plate is empty” instead of when they are full. That the answers to so many of our gastronomic quandaries are this simple should tell you something about how confused we are as eaters.

In the last section of the book, Pollan then gives his readers very short, simple, memorable rules to help us decide what and how to eat. Rules that are surprisingly easy to follow, like “don’t eat anything your grandmother wouldn’t recognize as food” (ie. Go-gurt: is this toothpaste?), and “Eat slowly.” Rules that make so much sense that it’s refreshing just to hear someone say them out loud.

I recommend this book to you for two reasons. First and foremost, because Pollan has in effect dethroned the nutritional clergy of scientists and journalist who tell us we can’t make good eating decisions without their “expert” guidance. But even if you’re not interested in his criticism of modern agribusiness, read his book because it’s an example of how to present evidence effectively. Pollan makes his ideas sticky (to borrow a term from the Heath Brothers). Or as Chris Brogan might say, he gives them handles that make it easy for his readers to pick them up and pass them around. Much as I am doing with you now.

I wish all speakers, writers, teachers, and communicators of any kind would work on refining their messages until they seem as simple and intuitive as Pollan’s. And, if you eat, I really think you should read this book.

Last night, I was reminded of this video of Ben Zander giving a presentation at TED two years ago. In it, he helps 1600 people discover their love of classical music by simply putting Chopin’s music in context for them. I thought of Ben’s talk because last night a little context was all I needed.

My wife and I went to the Huntsville Symphony Orchestra where we were treated to a medley of the symphonic dances from Bernstein’s West Side Story followed by the orchestral arrangement of Prokofiev’s Romeo and Juliet ballet. It’s easy to see why these pieces were paired together on the program. But to put it simply, the Bernstein was tremendous, the Prokofiev, not so much. What was missing from the Prokofiev? Context.

As I listened to the movements of the Bernstein medley, the music conjured up familiar images of Tony singing to Maria, or the Jets snapping their fingers to “Cool.” I’ve seen the movie, so I was much better prepared to understand the music.

Unfortunately for Prokofiev, I’ve never seen his ballet. And except for the Dance of the Knights (perfume commercial?) I’m not familiar with his music. I had no idea what part of Romeo and Juliet we were listening to for much of the concert which is more a testament to my ignorance of the flow of Shakespeare’s play than anything else. But for me, his fifteen movements got to be too much.

Like it or not, Prokofiev suffered because of what I didn’t know. Now, you could make a case for this being my fault. I could have done some studying ahead of time to familiarize myself with the music. But remember that it was Prokofiev, or at the very least, the HSO, who had something to communicate.

As a speaker, everything about getting your point across is up to you. It’s up to you to anticipate the areas of your audience’s ignorance and make allowance for them. Or better yet, give them the knowledge they lack and fill in the gaps in their knowledge that may come between them and your message. You can blame them all you want for not doing their homework but the final outcome will be that you fail to get your point across.

A little context can mean the difference between memorable and forgettable.

Which do you want to be?

How much of a nerd am I?

I’m such a nerd I watch SportsCenter for the infographics.

[ cue laugh track ]

But have you ever noticed how effective SportsCenter’s Rundown and Bottomline are? Take another look.

SportsCenter Infographic

SportsCenter's Rundown (left) and Bottomline (bottom) are expertly designed.

Together, these two graphical add-ons convey a large amount of information in a minimal amount of space.

The Bottomline cycles through at-a-glance information about all the games that are currently being played. For a baseball game, for instance, this information includes the teams playing, their respective scores, the inning, the count, and the men on base. The far left portion of the Bottomline tells you which sport you’re seeing scores for (MLB, NCAA, etc.) as well as how many more games there are in this category. In the span of a few minutes you can get a tremendous amount of detailed information about numerous games and all it costs ESPN is a few inches at the bottom of the screen. This is much more effective than the running news ticker most news programs insist on using.

The Rundown on the other hand is equally functional for those flipping over to ESPN for a few minutes while other shows are on commercial. In a few seconds, you can scan the headlines and see not only what is being discussed currently but also the next few topics on the docket, making it easy to decide whether you need to check back again in a few minutes. I wish the regular news had that.

Of course, all of this is in addition to SportsCenter’s usual programming.

These two remarkable examples of information design are inspiring. I wouldn’t recommend you add a live feed of sports scores to your next set of PowerPoint slides but I would encourage you to get the most out of every element you add to your slide. Every part of the Rundown and the Bottomline serves a purpose. Everything extra has been eliminated. The same should be true of great presentation visuals.